Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00195 (E.D. Tex. July 7, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00195, Dkt. No. 331
Decided
July 7, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 315 Motion to Continue
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Continue Trial Date. (Dkt. No. 315 (“Motion”).) In the Motion, Defendant argues that Ms. Kindler, Defendant’s damages expert, is scheduled to be on vacation from July 2, 2026 to July 19, 2026 during the Court’s July trial setting. Defendant represents that Ms. Kindler’s accommodations are non-refundable, and that Ms. Kindler is scheduled to testify in other trials later this year. Defendant also represents that Ms.