Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00195 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Smart RF Inc. (“Plaintiff”) previously filed an Opposed Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 41 (“Rule 41 Motion”) (Dkt. No. 100.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 295), recommending grant of Plaintiff’s Rule 41 Motion. Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon W ireless, and T -Mobile USA, Inc. (“Defendants”) have now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 298.) Additionally, Defendants previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Regarding U.S. Patent No.