Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2026)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Damages Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00477, Dkt. No. 434
Decided
January 14, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part 236 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to Supplement the Opening Damages Report of Justin Blok. (Motion(s)236 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Supplement the Opening Damages Report of Justin Blok. Dkt. No. 236. The motion is ripe. See Dkt. Nos. 278, 305. Additionally, the Court carried Defendants’ related arguments for exclusion of Mr. Blok’s reliance on the RossettiStarr Report to be addressed herein as well from their Daubert motion to exclude certain portions of Mr. Blok’s expert report. See Dkt. Nos. 251, 294, 335, 340.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case