Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants ’ Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Reports of Joseph McAlexander Regarding Infringement and Validity . Dkt. No. 261. The motion is fully briefed . See Dkt. Nos. 302, 324, 365. In the Motion, Defendants seek to strike portions of Plaintiff’s technical expert’s reports that rely on allegedly (1) previously undisclosed infringement theories— especially those related to U.S. Patent No. 7,557,788 (“’788 Patent”) —(2) an untimely erratum alleging infringement of limitation 1[d] of U.S. Patent No.