Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2026)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00477, Dkt. No. 449
Decided
January 15, 2026
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 415 Report and Recommendations. (Motions 415, 252 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Objection to Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation to AUO’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non- Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,233,305 (“the ’305 Patent”). Docket No. 433. BACKGROUND On November 12, 2025, Defendant AU Optronics Corporation filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non -Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,233,305 (“AUO Non-Infringement MSJ”). Docket No. 252. The motion is fully briefed. Docket Nos. 252, 301, 325, 356.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case