Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2026)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment Willfulness Induced Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00477, Dkt. No. 425
Decided
January 12, 2026
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER Overruling 418 Objections and Adopting 413 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Now before the Court is Plaintiff Phenix Longhorn, LLC’s (1) Objections to the Report and Recommendation Granting- in-Part the Hisense ’788 MSJ (Docket No. 253) and Granting-in-Part the AUO Willfulness MSJ (Docket No. 250); (2) Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Docket No. 413, Report and Recommendation; and (3) Motion for Continuance. Docket Nos. 418–420.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case