Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2026)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Infringement Willfulness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00477, Dkt. No. 451
Decided
January 15, 2026
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 413 Report and Recommendations. (Motions 413, 253, 250, 255 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Now before the Court are (1) Defendant AUO Corporation’s Objections to Report and Recommendation Regarding AUO’s Motion for Summary Judgment Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(g) (Docket No. 430); and (2) Defendants Hisense Electronica Mexico, S.A.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case