Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant AU Optronics Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Under FRCP 12(B)(6). Docket No. 12. The above -captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation which recommended denying the motion. Docket No. 34. Defendant AU Optronics Corporation (“AUO”) filed objections to the Report (Docket No. 39) and Plaintiff Phenix Longhorn, LLC filed a response (Docket No. 45).