Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2026)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendants ’ Motion to Exclude Opinions of Justin R. Blok. Dkt. No. 251. The Motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 294, 335, 340. In the Motion, Defendants seek to exclude portions of Plaintiff’s damages expert’s opinions because he allegedly (1) bases his opinions on a litigation settlement license without understanding how it was calculated, and without apportioning out the value of six other included patents, (2) uses market data to estimate importation but fails to account for sales from pr…
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error