Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00477 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Hybrid Witness Disclosures of Mr. Center Chen and Mr. Bear Syong. Dkt. No. 258. Because the Court carried Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1, Dkt. No. 338 at 1–7, with respect to this motion, the issues raised in th e motion in limine are also before the Court. Both are fully ripe for adjudication. See Dkt. Nos. 296, 328, 363, 371. For the reasons and to the extent discussed below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike and Motion in Limine No. 1. I.