Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 299
Decided
July 15, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 232 Report and Recommendations re 102 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment on Monetary Damages filed by Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd.. (Motion(s)102, 232 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Linctex previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Monetary Damages (Dkt. No. 102.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 232), recommending grant of Linctex’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Monetary Damages with respect to Plaintiff’s valuation -based approach for calculating damages, and otherwise denying the Motion. Linctex has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 248), with Plaintiff CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. filing a Response (Dkt. No.