Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 220
Decided
April 1, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 79 OPPOSED MOTION to Strike 70 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by CLO Virtual Fashion Inc.. (Motion(s)79 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Defendant’s Answer, filed by Plaintiff CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. Ltd.. Dkt. No. 79. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED only in PART. I. BACKGROUND On June 14, 2023, Plaintiff CLO filed suit against Defendant Linctex asserting that it infringes several of its patents: U.S. Patent N os. 10,733,773; 11,410,355; and 11,222,448. Dkt. No.1 at 2. On October 20, 2023, Defendant responded to the Plaintiff’s Complaint by filing a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 12.