Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 8, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 292
Decided
July 8, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 105 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION TO EXCLUDE REASONABLE ROYALTY AND LOST PROFITS OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT'S DAMAGES EXPERT MATTHEW FARBER. (Motion(s)105 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude Reasonable Royalty and Lost Profits Opinions and Testimony of Defendant’s Expert Matthew Farber, filed by Plaintiff CLO. Dkt. No. 105. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED only in part. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient fact…