CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2025)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Defendant’s Expert Ron Schnell, filed by Plaintiff CLO. Dkt. No. 106. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff CLO asserts that Defendant infringes three of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 10,733,773; 11,410,355; and 11,222,448. Dkt. No.1 at 2. On December 31, 2024, Defendant filed the instant Motion to Strike, arguing that the report of Defendant’s software expert, Mr. Ron Schnell, should be excluded in its entirety for a variety of reasons.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error