Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 291
Decided
July 6, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
n 7/6/2025. (NKL)MEMORANDUM ORDER re 103 SEALED MOTION to Exclude the Expert Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Muthu Govindaraj filed by Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd.. (Motion(s)103 terminated)
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports of Muthu Govindaraj, filed by Defendant Linctex. Dkt. No. 103; Dkt. No. 273. The motion also contends that the Court should strike sections Plaintiff’s November 22, 2024, amended infringement contentions. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff CLO asserts that Defendant infringes three of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 10,733,773; 11,410,355; and 11,222,448. Dkt. No.1 at 2.