CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2025)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports of Muthu Govindaraj, filed by Defendant Linctex. Dkt. No. 103; Dkt. No. 273. The motion also contends that the Court should strike sections Plaintiff’s November 22, 2024, amended infringement contentions. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff CLO asserts that Defendant infringes three of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 10,733,773; 11,410,355; and 11,222,448. Dkt. No.1 at 2.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error