Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2024)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 62
Decided
August 28, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd.. Objections due within 14 days of receipt
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 12). After consideration, the motion should be DENIED for the reasons provided below. I. APPLICABLE LAW In patent cases, personal jurisdiction closely relates to patent law, and Federal Circuit law governs the issue. Autogenomics, Inc. v. Oxford Gene Tech. Ltd., 566 F.3d 1012, 1016 (Fed. Cir. 2009).