CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 21, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Previously, Plaintiff CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. (“CLO”) filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 109.) In the Motion, CLO moves to foreclose Defendant Linctex’s (“Linctex”) defenses of ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102. ( Id. at 20.) Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Motion should be granted-in-part as to Linctex ’s ineligible subject matter defense but otherwise denied. (Dkt. No. 289.) Linctex has now filed its Objections. (Dkt.