Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 298
Decided
July 15, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 230 Report and Recommendations re 104 Sealed Motion filed by Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (Motion(s)104, 230 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Linctex previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 101. (Dkt. No. 104.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 230), recommending denial of Linctex’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 101. Linctex has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 244), with Pl aintiff CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. filing a Response (Dkt. No. 249.) After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C.