CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2025)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Defendant Linctex previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 101. (Dkt. No. 104.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 230), recommending denial of Linctex’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 101. Linctex has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 244), with Pl aintiff CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. filing a Response (Dkt. No. 249.) After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error