Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00497, Dkt. No. 1262
Decided
August 17, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court DENIES Defendants' motions for JMOL on the issues related to damages because the Court concludes that sufficient evidence supports the damages awarded by the jury
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants‟ Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (“Artesyn”), Astec America, Inc. (“Astec”), Cherokee International Corporation (“Cherokee”), and Lineage Power Corporation (“Lineage”) motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on th e issu es relating to damages (Dkt. No s. 811 and 817 ). Also pending before the Court is Defendants‟ Artesyn, Astec, Cherokee, Lineage , and Bel Fuse, Inc. (“Bel Fuse”) motion for JMOL on the issues relating to damages (Dkt. No. 968).