Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00497, Dkt. No. 1261
Decided
August 17, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court DENIES Defendants motions for JMOL on the issues related to infringement of the patents-in-suit because the Court concludes that sufficient evidence supports the jurys verdict on these issues
Length
30 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Defendants‟ Lineage Power Corporation (“Lineage”) and Cherokee International Corporation (“Cherokee”) motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on the issues relating to pre-suit induced and contributory infringement wit h respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,072,190 (“the „190 patent”), 7,272,021 (“the „021 patent”), and 7,269,034 (“the „034 patent”) (Dkt. Nos. 809 and 956) , and motions for JMOL on the issues relating to infringement of the patents -in-suit1 (Dkt. Nos. 820 and 95 5).