Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2011)

Granted
Inequitable Conduct
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00497, Dkt. No. 1249
Decided
July 13, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court finds that the defendants have not proven by clear and convincing evidence that SynQor committed prosecution laches during prosecution of the applications in the patents-in-suit. Thus, the Court find…
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION In this case, Plaintiff SynQor, Inc. (―SynQor‖) obtained a jury verdict of infringement against Defendants Artesyn Technologies, Inc. and Astec America Inc. (collectively ―Astec‖); Bel Fuse, Inc. (―Bel Fuse‖); Cherokee International Corp. and Lineage Power Corporation (collectively ―Lineage‖); Delta Electronics, Inc. and Delta Products Corp. (collectively ―Delta‖); Murata E lectronics North America, Inc. and Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (collectively ―Murata‖); Murata Power Solutions, Inc. (―MPS‖); and Power -One, Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case