SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above -titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham purs uant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of th e Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 1031), which contains his recommendation that the court deny the Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendants’ affirmative defenses and/or count erclaims of inequitable conduct as moot (Dkt. No. 462), has been prese nted for consideration. No party filed an objection to the report and recommendation.