SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is SynQor, Inc.’s (“SynQor”) contested amended bill of costs (Dkt. No. 1275). For the following reasons, the Court GRAN TS-IN-PART and DENIES -IN-PART SynQor’s amended contested bill of costs. I. BACKGROUND The Court entered a final judgment in this case on August 17, 2011, and awarded costs to the prevailing party, SynQor . ( Dkt. No. 1267.) On August 31 , 2011, SynQor submitted an amended bill of costs. (Dkt. No. 1275.) On September 14, 2011, Defendants submitted a joint opposition to Syn Qor’s motion for cost s.