Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00497, Dkt. No. 506
Decided
September 28, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - the Court adopts, in their entirety, the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this Court (Dkt. Nos. 489, 490, and 491). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion to strike Bel …
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-referenced case was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for pre-trial purposes in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Three reports of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. Nos. 489, 490, and 491) , which contain his recomme ndation that the Court grant plaintiff SynQor, Inc.’s (“Plain tiff” or “SynQor”) motion to stri ke Defendant Bel Fuse Inc.’s (“Bel Fuse”) inequitable conduct defenses (Dkt. No.