SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2010)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
The above-referenced case was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for pre-trial purposes in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Three reports of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. Nos. 489, 490, and 491) , which contain his recomme ndation that the Court grant plaintiff SynQor, Inc.’s (“Plain tiff” or “SynQor”) motion to stri ke Defendant Bel Fuse Inc.’s (“Bel Fuse”) inequitable conduct defenses (Dkt. No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error