Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. July 26, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00497, Dkt. No. 474
Decided
July 26, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to eachothers claim construc…
Length
58 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff SynQor, Inc. (“SynQor”) filed su it against numerous defendants (collectively “Defendants”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,072,190 (“the ‘190 patent”), 7,269,034 (“the ’034 patent”), 7,272,021 (“the ‘021 patent”), 7,558,083 (“the ‘083 patent”), and 7,564,702 (“the ‘702 patent”) (collectively the “patents-in-suit”). The ‘190, ‘034, ‘083, and ‘702 patents are all entitled “High Effi ciency Power Converter,” and are continuations of an original patent application filed in 1998.