Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00497 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00497, Dkt. No. 1264
Decided
August 17, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
ge T. John Ward on 8/17/11. (ehs, )MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court DENIES Defendants motions for JMOL on the issues related to the invalidity of the patents-in-suit because the Court concludes that sufficient evidence supports the …
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the C ourt are Defendants‟ Delta Electronics, Inc., Delta Products Corp., Murata Electronics North America, Inc., Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Murata Power Solutions, Inc., and Power -One, Inc. (collectively the “Fish Defendants”) motions for judgment as a matter of law (“J MOL”) on the issues relating to the validity of the patents -in-suit1 (Dkt. Nos. 846 and 959). Also pending before the Court are Defendants‟ Astec America, Inc., Artesyn Technologies, Inc., Cherokee International Corp. and Lineage Power Corp.