Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Mass Engineered Design Inc.’s (“Mass”) Motion to Compel Interview Notes of Mirek Waraksa (Docket No. 466). Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND This suit involves U.S. patent RE 36,978 (“‘978 patent”), a reissue of U.S. patent 5,687,939 (“‘939 patent”). As set forth in the Co urt’s September 14th Order, in early 1996, Plaintiff J erry Moscovitch retained Canadian attorney and U.S.