Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court previously ruled on Ergotron’s Motion to Compel Discovery and for an Order Concerning Plaintiff’s Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege (Docket No. 162). See Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 270. In that opinion, the Court ordered MASS to p roduce four documents. The Court referenced MASS’s exhibits to Docket No. 234, which was filed ex parte. As De fendants a re un able to v iew t he e xhibit li st t o D ocket No. 234, the Cou rt iss ues th is supplemental opinion to further identify the exhibits that it ordered MASS to produce.