Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Dell Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2 (Indefiniteness) (Docket No. 137) and the claim construction of the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. RE 36,978 (the “‘978 patent”) and 5,673,170 (the “‘170 patent). For the reasons stated in the “Angled toward each other to a desired degree & Angles relative to each other to a de sired d egree” c onstructions, the Cou rt DENIES Dell’s Motion for Summary J udgment (Docket No. 137).