Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Having considere d the par ties’ written submissions along w ith the evidence , the Court DENIES Dell’s Motion for Perma nent I njunction or Reasona ble Roy alty (Doc ket No. 670), DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (“JMOL”) or New Trial (Docket No. 666), GRANTS in part Plai ntiffs’ Motion for Post-Trial Relief (Doc ket No. 682), a nd DENIES Dell’s Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorneys’ Fees (Docket No. 671).