Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 30, 2008)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00272, Dkt. No. 315
Decided
April 30, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting #265 motion for leave to file and #269 Mass's motion for leave to amend. Denies in part and Grants in part Tech Data's motion to dismiss #200
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff MASS Engineered Design, Inc.’s (“MASS”) Motion for Leave to File Cross-Claim for Patent Infringement (Docket No. 265), MASS and Plaintiff J erry Moscovitch’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions (Docket No. 269), and Third- Party Defendant Tech Data Corporation’s (“Tech Data”) Motion to Dismiss CDW Corporation’s (“CDW”) Third-Party Complaint, or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement And Motion to Transfer , or in the Alterna tive, Motion to Bifurca te (Docket No. 200).