Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2008)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00272, Dkt. No. 373
Decided
August 7, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - for the aforementioned reasons herein, the court GRANTS CDW's motion 295
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Third-Party Plaintiff CDW Corporation’s (“CDW”) Rule 56(d) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of the Liability of Third-Party Defendant Global Marketing Partners, Inc. (“Global”) (Docket No. 295). After careful consideration of the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS CDW’s motion. BACKGROUND On June 7, 2006, Plaintiffs filed their complaint alleging that CDW and the other defendants infringed U.S. Patent No.