Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. May 30, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00272, Dkt. No. 343
Decided
May 30, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying Pltf's motion #279 and #281 as set forth herein
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs MASS Engineered Design, Inc. and Jerry Moscovitch’s (collectively “MASS”) Motion For Leave to Amend Their Answer to Dell Marketing, L.P.’s Counterclaim (Docket No. 279) and MASS’s Motion for Leave to Serve Invalidity Contentions (Docket No. 281). After careful consideration of the parties’ written submissions, the Court DENIES both of MASS’s motions for leave. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS Background MASS and Jerry Moscovitch (collectively “MASS”) allege Ergotron, Inc. (“Ergotron”), Dell Inc.