Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2007)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00272, Dkt. No. 65
Decided
May 11, 2007
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court grants DLMP's Motion to Intervene 44, and denies as moot Dell Inc and DLMP's Request for a Ruling on the motion to intervene 62. The court orders the parties to submit within ten days of this ord…
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Dell Marketing L.P.’s (“DLMP”) Motion to Intervene (Docket No. 44). Having considered the parties’ written argumen ts, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Court DENIES as moot Dell Inc. and DLMP’s Request for a Ruling on the motion to intervene (Docket No. 62). ANALYSIS Mass Engineered Design, Inc. and Jerry Moscovitch (collectively “MASS”) brought this patent infringement suit against several entities, including Dell Inc., claiming they infringe U.S. Patent No. RE 36,978 (the “‘978 patent”).