Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Realtime Data LLC v. Actian Corporation et al, No. 6:15-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2017)

Denied
Motion to Strike Daubert / Expert Challenges Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 538
Decided
May 1, 2017
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
7) days of the issuance of this Order, the parties shall file a notice with the Court as to whether this Order can be unsealed, or request appropriate redaction
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Riverbed Technology , Inc.’s (“ Riverbed”) Motion to Strike the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Arthur Keller and Mr. Robert Mills Based on Improper Apportionment. (Doc. No. 514.) Plaintiff Realtime Data, LLC (“Realtime”) has filed a Sealed Response. (Doc. No. 524.) The Court previously struck the opinions o f two of Realtime’s experts, Dr. Keller and Mr. Mills, related to calculating the value attributable to the allegedly patented features of the accused products. (Doc. No. 481, at 11.) The Court found that Dr.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case