Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Realtime Data LLC v. Actian Corporation et al, No. 6:15-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. May 8, 2017)

Denied
Motion to Strike Daubert / Expert Challenges Claim Construction Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 557
Decided
May 8, 2017
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING the portion of 440 Riverbed's Motion that remains pending, and specifically DENYING Riverbed's Motion with respect to Dr. Mitzenmacher's allegedly irrelevant testing
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Riverbed Technology, Inc.’s (“Riverbed”) Motion to Strike New Infringement Theories and Irrelevant Testing from the Expert Report of Dr. Mitzenmacher. (Doc. No. 440.) Plaintiff Realtime Data, LLC (“Realtime”) has filed a Sealed Response (Doc. No. 455), Riverbed has filed a Reply (Doc. No. 467), and Realtime has filed a Sealed Sur -Reply (Doc. No. 476). The Court heard oral argument regarding this Motion on April 11, 2017. The Court previously issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order addressing the arguments regarding Dr.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case