Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Realtime Data LLC v. Actian Corporation et al, No. 6:15-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. June 14, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 318
Decided
June 14, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER DENYING 303 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reviews filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Oracle America, Inc., Riverbed Technology, Inc., EchoStar Corporation, SAP America, Inc., Dell Inc., Hughes Ne…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defe ndants’ Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (Doc. No. 303).1 Plaintiff (“Realtime”) filed a response (Doc. No. 314). Having considered the parties’ arguments and for the reasons set forth below, Defendant s Motion to Stay is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. BACKGROUND On May 8, 2015, Realtime filed its original complaint against Defendants alleging infringement of three of Realtime’s patents. Doc No. 1 . Subsequently, Realtime expanded its complaint to allege infringement of five total patents.2 Doc. Nos. 100–107.