Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Realtime Data LLC v. Actian Corporation et al, No. 6:15-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 492
Decided
April 4, 2017
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***UNSEALED PER ORDER 501.***SEALED MEMORNDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES Riverbeds Motion for Partial Summary Judgement Barring Pre-Suit Damages. (Doc. No. 438)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Riverbed Technology, Inc.’s (“Riverbed”) Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgement Barring Pre -Suit Damages. (Doc. No. 438 .) Plaintiff Realtime Data, LLC (“Realtime”) has filed a Sealed Response (Doc. No. 453), Riverbed has filed a Reply (Doc. No. 465), and Realtime has filed a Sealed Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 475).1 For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Riverbed’s Motion. (Doc. No. 438.) I. BACKGROUND Realtime alleges that Riverbed infringes certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,415,530 (“the ’530 Patent”), U.S.