Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 549
Decided
September 3, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 511 Report and Recommendations, re 201 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by AT&T Mobility II LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, Ericsson Inc., Nokia of America Corporation, AT&T …
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD., Plaintiff, v. AT&T CORP., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, and AT&T SERVICES INC., Defendants, ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP., Intervenors. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § C IVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00123-JRG-RSP O RDER Defendants1 previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 201). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No.