Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike #3: Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Kowalski Related to Technical Benefit of the ’803 Patent. Dkt. No. 1 99. Dr. Kowalski was “asked to determine and quantify the benefit of implementations that use Claim 12 of the ’803 Patent compared to implementations that do not use Claim 12.” Dkt. No. 199-3 at ¶ 28. I.