Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 106
Decided
April 25, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting 86 denying 88
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Daingean Technologies LTD’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions (Dkt. No. 86). Also before the Court is a c ross-motion by Defendant AT&T,1 along with Intervenors Nokia of America Corporation and Ericsson, Inc., challenging the sufficiency of the proposed amendments pursuant to P.R. 3- 1(c) (Dkt. No. 88) . For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Still active in this case are three patents: U.S. Patent Nos.