Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 550
Decided
September 3, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 512 Report and Recommendations re 202 Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Non- Infringement Based on the Non-Implemented and Never Used Interference Sensing Feature filed by AT&…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD., Plaintiff, v. AT&T CORP., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, and AT&T SERVICES INC., Defendants, ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP., Intervenors. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § C IVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00123-JRG-RSP O RDER Defendants1 previously filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Non- Infringement Based on the Non-I mplemented and Never Used “Interfer ence Sensing” Feature (Dkt. No. 202).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case