Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment License / Exhaustion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 545
Decided
September 3, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 442 Report and Recommendations re 194 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants/Intervenors License Defense and on AT&Ts FRAND Counterclaim filed by Daingean Technologies Ltd. (Motion(s)4…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’/Intervenors’ License Defen se and on AT&T’s FRAND Counterclaim (the "Daingean Motion"). (Dkt. No. 194.) Relatedly, Intervenor Nokia of America Corp. previously filed a Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of License and Exhaustion, or in the alternative, Lack of Standing (the "Nokia Motion"). (Dkt. No. 203.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case