Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 4, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 560
Decided
September 4, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
rap on 09/04/2025. (KLC)ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 517 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 199 SEALED MOTION to Strike 3: Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Kowalski Related to Technical Benefit of the '803 Patent
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD., Plaintiff, v. AT&T CORP., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, and A T&T SERVICES INC., Defendants, ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP., Intervenors. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CI VIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00123-JRG-RSP ORDE R Defendants1 previously filed a Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Kowalski Related to Technical Benefit of the ’803 Patent . (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case