Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 516
Decided
August 21, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 192 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT DR. VAN DER WEIDE filed by Daingean Technologies Ltd.. (Motion(s)192 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd.’s Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Defendants’ Expert Dr. van der Weide. Dkt. No. 192. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion IN PART. I. LEGAL STANDARD An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony…