Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:23-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00095, Dkt. No. 267
Decided
November 1, 2024
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 236 Report and Recommendations, 235 Report and Recommendations, 243 Report and Recommendations, 241 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s)110, 111, 115, 113 terminated)
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the C ourt are several motions for summary judgment filed by both parties: (1) Plaintiff Wireless Alliance, LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the 3GPP Documents are not Prior Art (Docket No. 110); (2) Plaintiff Wireless Alliance, LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the Asserted Patents are not FRAND Encumbered and Denying Defendants’ Thirteenth Affirmative Defense (Contractual Limitation o n Damages—FRAND) (Docket No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case