Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:23-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 23, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00095, Dkt. No. 242
Decided
October 23, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 108 Sealed Motion
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike the Testimony of Defendants’ expert Craig Bishop filed by Plaintiff Wireless Alliance (“WA”). Dkt. No. 108. For the reasons discussed below , the Court DENIES the Motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is th…