Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:23-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2024)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff’s Expert, Dr. Jon Putnam filed by Intervenor Ericsson Inc. Dkt. No. 100. For the reasons discussed below , the Court DENIES the Motion. Ericsson presents two separate bases for disqualification. First, they argue that Dr. Putnam’s contract prohibits him from “working adverse to Ericsson,” and second that the Koch v. Boudreaux factors are met. Id. at 3.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error