Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:23-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2024)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00095, Dkt. No. 251
Decided
October 28, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 112 SEALED MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE EXPERT REPORTS OF STEPHEN WICKER filed by Wireless Alliance, LLC. (Motion(s)112 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike the Testimony of Defendants’ expert Dr. Wicker filed by Plaintiff Wireless Alliance, LLC. Dkt. No. 112. For the reaso ns discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion only IN PART. I. LEGAL STANDARD An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to und erstand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testi…

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case