Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:23-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00095, Dkt. No. 246
Decided
October 24, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 109 Sealed Motion to Strike and Exclude Portions of the Expert Report of Dr. Todor Cooklev
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike the Testimony of Plaintiff’s expert Dr. Todor Cooklev filed by Defendants. Dkt. No. 109. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS- IN-PART AND DENIES-IN-PART the Motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimo…